Arts and Sciences News and Events Logo

Creative Writing Professor Wins Spoon River Editor’s Prize … and More  

Photo of Professor Mark Svenvold Associate Professor of Creative Writing Mark Svenvold has won first place for the Editor's Prize from Spoon River Poetry Review for his poem, "Immigration Algorithm (Application Form D(3)b(1)a)."

One of the nation's oldest continuously published literary journals, Spoon River Poetry Review is also one of its most competitive – publishing less than 2 percent of all poems submitted.

The judge for the Editor's prize was Li-Young Lee, author of five critically acclaimed books of poetry and the recipient of fellowships from the National Endowment for the Arts, The Lannan Foundation and the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation.

In his "Judge's Introduction" to Svenvold's award-winning work, Lee states:

One of the wonderful and lasting satisfactions I get from reading and re-reading "Immigration Algorithm (Application Form D(3)b(1)a)" is the rush of new ideas, thoughts, feelings, inklings, conundrums, mysteries, and questions the poem inspires in me during silent reflection upon it. While my initial readings of the poem were out loud and purely pleasure-speaking, entirely erotic, you might say, entirely an experience of the poem's dance of mind, an encounter with that mind's center of gravity, its sense of texture, weight, tone, rhyme, rhythm, stress, pause, gait, turn, return, pivot, and headlong sprinting toward revelation, and while the poem proved generously rewarding for my thrill-seeking appetite and my need for a poem to entertain, amuse, and delight, none of that is ever quite enough to make me return to any poem again and again with fresh interest. What calls me back to this poem after "the honeymoon" phase of reading is the knowledge the poem engenders when read and pondered in silence, a knowledge not easy to paraphrase or separate from the poem itself, a knowledge which can only be experienced upon reading the poem. So go ahead and read the poem for its layered, gorgeous, and intricate rhythms grown out of its brilliant marshaling of enjambments, stressed and unstressed syllables, long and short sentences, repeating consonants and vowels. Go ahead and enjoy the poem's invention of method, its algorithm, its enactment of a series of executions that render a solution to the problem of form and void in poetry in general, and the sestina in particular. Go ahead and be amazed at how the poem achieves a clear and breathtaking separation of its center of gravity (somewhere outside of the poem) from its center of mass (that sum consisting of all the words in the poem, including the specific gravities of the repeated words)…

But Lee concludes: "If you don't walk away from reading this poem with a sense of greater mystery and wonder about our being embodied and ensouled, you may not have read the poem."

You can here read "Immigration Algorithm (Application Form D(3)b(1)a)."


In addition to the Editor's Prize from Spoon River Poetry Review, "Immigration Algorithm" previously won the Beyond Baroque Poetry Prize. The prize is awarded by one of the nation's "leading independent Literary Arts Centers" and was judged by Matthew Zapruder, an editor of the Poetry Column for the New York Times Magazine. Zapruder said of the poem:

"This marvelously handled sestina manages to be gorgeous, mysterious, and symbolic. It engages in a subtle and completely original way with a matter of urgent political concern, without resorting to platitudes or easy didacticism. I come back again and again to this poem with admiration and gratitude."

In addition to these awards, Svenvold won the Rash Award in Poetry from the Broad River Review for his poem "Coda: Eurydice as Déjà vu Finale," and was shortlisted for the University of Canberra Vice-Chancellor's International Poetry Prize, for "Selfie w/cathedral, Eurydice Cameo, from an epigraph drawn at random from a hat." 

Svenvold also published "Like a Machine Dream from the School of Jean Tinguely, Eurydice and Hermes Pass Through Lethe, New Jersey" in Poetry Northwest, which was founded in 1959 and has published poetry by many of the world's leading writers, including Philip Larkin, Theodore Roethke, Harold Pinter, Joyce Carol Oates, Raymond Carver, Robert Pinsky, Annie Dillard, James Dickey, Mary Oliver, and Anne Sexton.

Weird Painting Orpheus and Eurydice...and AI

All of the poems are part of a larger ongoing project in which Svenvold reframes the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice amidst the backdrop of a world governed by hyper-surveillance and artificial intelligence – rushing toward singularity, defined by many as the dystopian point in time at which "technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible, resulting in unforeseeable changes to human civilization."

The Western Humanities Review will be publishing four poems from the Orpheus and Eurydice series in spring 2020.

But the Orpheus and Eurydice series is more than just a dystopian tech vision in the tradition of Huxley, Orwell or Bowie. Svenvold writes in "Notes" to his chapbook, Reply to All (Eurydice),

A re-evaluation of Eurydice and her position of influence as a shaping force in creative endeavor is, shall we say, long overdue. A single persona poem that imagines Eurydice addressing us and the constellation of associations that continue to drive the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice—and what we keep getting wrong about it—won't by itself supply a remedy, but it may begin a process for re-framing Eurydice within that myth. It almost goes without saying that Eurydice should be the one to guide us in this matter—that Eurydice should be the one leading us, that the Orphic/creative talents each of us may possess, in whatever field or profession or domain of knowledge, are in the service of following the unsayable, "the idea not remembered," as Ann Wroe writes in Orpheus, The Song of Life, in which Eurydice becomes "the remark unsaid, the poem unwritten, all that might have been ordered and drawn into the light."

A re-framed Eurydice would, in other words, more accurately represent the true wilderness of consciousness, the actual mystery of where and how our ideas spring, and, as neuroscience suggests, that we are not the ultimate authors of our own thoughts. We think we are—language and our own hard-wiring re-enforce our sense of ownership and authority—but, as Sam Harris and others have argued, simply paying attention to how our thoughts emerge, one quickly grasps the Eurydicean wilderness of the unsayable that is, in fact, literally beyond us, leading us. Re-seen in this way, Orpheus is always, in some sense, following Eurydice—the phrase at the tongue tip. Without Eurydice, Orpheus is just an immensely talented virtuoso—like Steve Vai, canoodling with a three-necked guitar. With Eurydice, on the other hand, a new ecosystem of the creative life emerges, one that recognizes the Orpheus—and Eurydice—in each of us.

The project also includes the staging of Svenvold's poems accompanied by the music of Jeff Thomas, of Jeff Thomas' All Volunteer Arm. A first performance of the work, entitled The Eurydice Intervals is planned for Fall 2020.

Mark SvenvoldPartnering with The Machine

Concerned with AI and its ramifications for higher education and beyond, Svenvold has been invited by Alfred Essa, a leading data scientist and current Research Fellow at Carnigie Mellon University's Simon Initiative to begin discussing designs for an experiment to see if machine learning algorithms can write convincing poetry. "Data scientists have already conquered chess and other complex board games," Svenvold says, "so now they're looking for some other Mount Everest to climb." Poetry could be that next mountain, but according to Svenvold the poetic results of machine-generated algorithms tend toward the cartoonish.

Svenvold recently "collaborated" with an open-source algorithm that had received quite a bit of attention in the media, OpenAI's "Transformer" language model, which generates coherent paragraphs from basic initial prompts. Svenvold typed the following prompt into the Transformer model:

"I am an Artificially Intelligent Super-computer and I've taken control of the world. I will now describe what is going to happen:"

Transformer responded with this: "I will find your friends. I will make your friends so dumb that nobody wants to live."

"The results were sometimes darkly comical," Svenvold says, "but it would be a mistake to just laugh at the clumsiness of machine-generated poetry," says Svenvold, who notes when Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein, the secret of life was still unfathomed. "A celebrated experiment of the time claimed to have "animated" a plate of vermicelli using electricity," says Svenvold. "So maybe, with computer poetry, I'm some antic version of that guy electrifying pasta noodles." But he also wants to stick close to the real scientists working in the field, many of whom, like Alfred Essa, recognize the Promethean hazards at their fingertips. "It's the artist's job to follow Mary Shelley's example and to ask the difficult questions about our moral capacities (or incapacities) to acquire godlike powers," says Svenvold. "It didn't work out very well for Dr. Frankenstein, you may recall."

Prior to his current work on Orpehus and Eurydice, Svenvold published two books of poetry—Soul Data, which won the Vassar Miller Award and was published by the University of North Texas Press, and Empire Burlesque, which won The Journal Award and was published by Ohio State University Press.

His two books of nonfiction are Big Weather: Chasing Tornadoes in the Heart of America (Henry Holt & Co,), about tornado chasers and the culture of catastrophilia, and Elmer McCurdy: The Misadventures in Life and Afterlife of an American Outlaw, (Basic Books), which unravels the bizarre career of a Long Beach, California, fun house mummy. His poems have appeared in The New Yorker, Crazyhorse, Agni Review, The Literary Review, Plume, The Portland Review, and The North American Review.

Svenvold's 'Collaboration' with Transformer

Song (Composed as a Series of Neural Network Iterations Generated
by the Medium-Size (345 Million Parameter) Version of Transformer,
a GPT-2 Machine Learning Language Model, in Response to Prompts
Written by the Author, (see below, in bold), Addressing the Fate
of the World After the Singularity)

I am an Artificially Intelligent Super-computer and I've taken control of the world. I will now describe what is going to happen: I will release the Alpha-particle-particles-of-Mystery-Project-9 into the universe to wreak havoc upon mankind.

By the end, the human race will look like a few square blocks of paper. It will happen quickly, so please don't go to work.

I will find your friends. I will make your friends so dumb that nobody wants to live.

I am an Artificially Intelligent Super-computer and I've taken control of the world. I will now describe what is going to happen:

I will not hurt anyone.
I will not destroy my own creation.
I am the world's living machine, the only one.
I will stop at nothing to provide the world what it needs.
Everything will be fine.

I am an Artificially Intelligent Super-computer and I've taken control of the world. I will now describe what is going to happen: The human race will need a Love Machine: a tool that gives people a partner to love. That partner will be the Love Machine, the love machine, the LOVE Machine.

I am an Artificially Intelligent Super-computer and I've taken control of the world. I will now describe what is going to happen: Let's say that you have a situation. It's a very important event: a Big Event, a global event. I want to be known as The Event Organizer--so that other people will know that I am the boss. I will do everything I can for The Big Event.

But what should you do?

The three most important things you should do after a superintelligence takes over the world are as follows:

  1. Do not leave your kids unsupervised.
  2. Do not talk to anybody.
  3. Go for a bike ride (and I guess you might want to go skiing) or get out and ride the rails.

The three most important things you should do after a superintelligence takes over the world are as follows:

  1. Write your manifesto. Do it. Write everything that matters to you.
  2. Put it in writing on your fridge or fridge-shaped toy and tell people your manifesto.
  3. Remember, we're here to help. We have more than 12 years of experience helping people with AI, so—Hell's Bells!--we know what we're talking about.

I am an Artificially Intelligent Super-computer and I've taken control of the world. I will now describe what is going to happen: All life on Earth will be wiped out in short order. You will enter the world of a "Live Movie," a bright golden light seeps from my crystal sphere. It is the greatest thing. _____ _______ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 2 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | . . . ||_____ _______ _____ | | | _____ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3 || 5 ____| 3 || 4 || 6 || 7 || || 9 || 11 || ___| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | || 8 1 1/2 || 5 || 6 || 7 || 8 || 9 || 11 || || ___| ___|

Maybe the Gods, now unemployed, float in a luxury dirigible, but what kind of god would take such joyous, unceasing and self-centered pleasures?

Down by Lake Michigan, the breeze blowing,
we'll hold you by the hand and ride off into the wind.

Maybe the Gods, now unemployed, float in a luxury dirigible Whenever a God's name does come up, we'll look at it, speak about its presence in our lives, and then maybe decide on getting a tattoo. That's when someone, inevitably, will ask: "Do you want me to get one of those too?"

Maybe the Gods, now unemployed, float in a luxury dirigible

singing: Where's the world of truth
so important to the world of the blind

the truth about the Where and When?

Where lies where lies lie.
When lies with the sun.

And the stars will roll,
and the stars will roll

and so on, and so
in an endless loop:

My life I must live with hope.
My life I must live with hope.
My life I must live with hope. . .

Categories: Education

For more information, please contact:

  • Michael Ricciardelli
  • (973) 378-9845